Batman v Superman (SPOILER FREE)
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:53 am
(Spoiler free, until the rest of you see the film anyway.)
'Kay. I just feel I need to talk about this film because I was more more a DC guy than I was of Marvel so I felt that I have more invested in BvS than I am in an MCU film. So what did think of it overall? It was good, but not exceptional. Allow me to tell you my biggest problem with it: the pacing. Much like 2011's Green Lantern and Man of Steel before it, BvS tries to cram three films into one and often jumps all over the place to move the plot at a frenetic pace despite being two and a half hours long and I hate to say it, but despite the pace, it can be a brutal slog like the lesser MCU films. However, the last act was worth it to me. CGI Doomsday looked terrible, but I enjoyed the final battle more than MoS' climax and even said "Hell, Yeah!" when Wonder Woman showed up to kick some ass.
Some highlights for me:
I know critics are savaging this film, but part of me think it is because DC/Warner Bros is not using Marvel's formula. However, if DC/WB did copied Marvel, I am reasonably certain that the critics would tear it apart for being too derivative, so I place next to no faith in the reviews. Marvel's heroes were men, but DC's heroes were are gods and more elemental in nature. Is it a terribly flawed film? Oh yes, but a terrible film? No. It is not like Marvel has a clean record either. Iron Man 3 is one of the worst superhero movies I have seen, and Thor: The Dark World and Avengers: Age of Ultron were mediocre at best because they felt more like a checklist to get to the grand finale, Infinity War. In terms of atmosphere, I appreciate was DC is trying to do. They didn't quite get it right, but it was still a good effort.
'Kay. I just feel I need to talk about this film because I was more more a DC guy than I was of Marvel so I felt that I have more invested in BvS than I am in an MCU film. So what did think of it overall? It was good, but not exceptional. Allow me to tell you my biggest problem with it: the pacing. Much like 2011's Green Lantern and Man of Steel before it, BvS tries to cram three films into one and often jumps all over the place to move the plot at a frenetic pace despite being two and a half hours long and I hate to say it, but despite the pace, it can be a brutal slog like the lesser MCU films. However, the last act was worth it to me. CGI Doomsday looked terrible, but I enjoyed the final battle more than MoS' climax and even said "Hell, Yeah!" when Wonder Woman showed up to kick some ass.
Some highlights for me:
- Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. He seems to follow Gene Hackman and Kevin Spacey's portrayals of Luthor in the Donner and Singer films rather than the Clancy Brown and Mark Rolston portrayals in the DCAU and Young Justice. I know some people will hate it, especially a friend of mine who argues that a Superman film would be better if told from Luthor's point of view. However, despite his maniacal performance, Eisenberg's Luthor actually came off as a threat because of his borderline psychotic behaviour in the film.
- Again, Wonder Woman. Her character suffers from the film's pacing issues, but I really enjoyed seeing her in battle and when the trinity came together.
- Affleck as Batman did not turn out as badly as I thought. I thought he was better than Christian Bale because he did not go over the top with the "growly" voice. He plays the slightly burned-out veteran of a decades long crusade, driven to breaking point when the Last Son of Krypton shows up. Jeremy Irons was entertaining as Alfred, who was different from Michael Caine's version from the Dark Knight
- Seeing glimpses Aquaman, Cyborg, and the Flash was a delight.
- Do yourself a favour and do not stay past the credits. There is no post-credits scene. Marvel conditioned us to think that every superhero film has one. BvS does not.
I know critics are savaging this film, but part of me think it is because DC/Warner Bros is not using Marvel's formula. However, if DC/WB did copied Marvel, I am reasonably certain that the critics would tear it apart for being too derivative, so I place next to no faith in the reviews. Marvel's heroes were men, but DC's heroes were are gods and more elemental in nature. Is it a terribly flawed film? Oh yes, but a terrible film? No. It is not like Marvel has a clean record either. Iron Man 3 is one of the worst superhero movies I have seen, and Thor: The Dark World and Avengers: Age of Ultron were mediocre at best because they felt more like a checklist to get to the grand finale, Infinity War. In terms of atmosphere, I appreciate was DC is trying to do. They didn't quite get it right, but it was still a good effort.